Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: DAW Platform Specifics

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Foxboro, MA
    Well... I hope I'm doing this correctly...

    Hardware: Carillon
    D/A: RADAR-24 w/Nyquist converters
    Mix platform (A): Yamaha PM-2000 32x 8
    Mix platform (B): Dangerous 2 Buss
    A/D: Crane Song LTD. "Spider"

    We did each mix platform with the tape emulation at "0" for one of the 3 "sample" prints.
    Mercenary Audio

    Roscoe Ambel once said:
    Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Source: MX2424
    Mix: SONY DMX-R100
    Recorder: ALESIS Masterlink

    clock master=MX2424
    NYC Drew

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Nuendo 1.6

    Dual PIII- 1 GHz 1 GB RAM W2K Pro.
    Nuendo 96/52 cards
    Nuendo 8 I/Os
    TC|Works Powercore
    Mackie UAD-1 Card
    Rosendahl Nanoclocks

    Mix "B" included the standard Nuendo Dither plugin set to:
    -Dithering type 1
    -Noise shaping type 1
    Didn't want to use the Apogee (also included in Nuendo), because PT also had to use there own build-in dithering.
    Therefore I thought that using Nuendo's native dither would be the most "honest" option.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    TN, USA
    The basics:

    Studio Vision Pro 4.5

    Mac G4 dual 1 GHz “MDD” 512 Ram
    Mac OS 9.2
    RME Hammerfall 96/52
    Apogee Rosetta
    Waves 4.09 Ren Comp, L2
    Bias Peak
    Roxio Toast
    Metering – Waves PAZ 4.09, Spectrafoo, Elemental Audio Inspector.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Fort Wayne, IN, USA
    Rick Krizman, one of the testers that did an analog mix, sent me the following details of his testing.

    My job was to test analog summing from PTHD v.5.3.1 through my Trident Series 24 console. This is roughly the same technology as a Series 65, only with 24
    buses. Please note this is not a Series 80, nor is it of the same quality.
    The console itself is from the mid-80's. Eight of the inputs plus the output
    module have been modified by Jim Williams who recapped and replaced the
    standard chips with high slew rate video chips. The result, to oversimplify,
    is greater clarity and transparency with less of a characteristic Trident

    Assisted by Michael Perricone (mixing engineer, former owner of Interlock
    post), I set up 16 channels of HD 192 and 8 channels of Apogee AD-8000. We ran
    each channel of the session out these converters into the line ins of the
    Trident and returned the mix output of the Trident into 2 channels of the HD
    192 and a stereo bus in the Protools session. A PAZ meter was inserted on this return bus and the analog fader of each track was adjusted to show the desired -12 level on bus, to within a tenth of a db. When these levels were set we
    played the mix and compared it to the phase-reversed summed mix included with the session. At this point eight tracks did not cancel. It turned out that
    these tracks were the ones being outputted by the Apogee and that this was a latency issue. We moved those tracks up 14 samples and they cancelled also.

    To generate the unity mix we did a stereo-interleaved 24 bit bounce-to-disc
    from the return bus in Protools. To generate the variable-fader mix, we
    lowered the individual faders in Protools 3 db and then fine tuned with the
    analog faders to show a reading of -15 on the return bus for each track. We
    then compensated for this reduction by raising the PT master fader up 3 db, and
    did the bounce-to-disc. Any dither was from whatever the program automatically
    supplies (no plugins were harmed in the course of this experiment).

    Rick Krizman,
    Michael Perricone

    [ April 07, 2003: Message edited by: 3D Audio Inc. ]
    Lynn Fuston
    3D Audio

    Making beautiful music SEEM easy since 1979.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Fort Wayne, IN, USA
    Almost forgot to mention my platform.

    ProTools 5.1.1 on a Mix+ system, running on a G3 266 under OS 9.2.2. Analog and digital cabling by DH Labs.

    Mix A used the "non-dithered" PT mixer and Mix B used the "dithered mixer."

    [ April 07, 2003: Message edited by: 3D Audio Inc. ]
    Lynn Fuston
    3D Audio

    Making beautiful music SEEM easy since 1979.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Lexington, Ky.
    I did the Sonar 2.2XL test.

    Dual Athlon 2000
    512 MB of RAM
    Seagate HD's
    MOTU 1224, 24i and MTP AV

    I cooked the CD with Roxio EZ-CD Creator at 1x burn speed on a Plextor CD-Burner



  8. #18
    Haigbabe's Avatar
    Haigbabe is offline 3D VIP 2004, '05, '06, '07, '08, '09, '10, '11, '12
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Cool Edit Pro V2

    Checked on three machines that may reflect typical user.

    1. PC Piii, Sounblaster card, etc

    2. PC AMD XP1800+, Digi 001 etc

    3. PC AMD XP2400+, Yamaha card. (Also ran V1.2, same result)

    All machines running Windows XP. Standard plugs etc. Metering was using CEP metering and crosschecked in PT and Wavelab.

    All machines gave same result.

    Best regards,

    Proud supporter of 3D as a 2012 3D VIP

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Session specifics
    By 3daudioinc in forum Neve vs. PT Mix CD
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-31-2014, 10:35 PM
  2. How to create a cross platform Enhanced CD?
    By gerax in forum The Old Yellow Board
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-16-2006, 04:16 AM
  3. So How DO You Decide What Mixing Platform to Use?
    By Wireline in forum The Old Yellow Board
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-04-2005, 06:35 AM
  4. If you would like to try this test on your platform
    By 3daudioinc in forum Awesome DAW-SUM Comparison
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-14-2003, 05:45 PM
  5. The Rules for Testing
    By 3daudioinc in forum Awesome DAW-SUM Comparison
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-24-2003, 10:44 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts